Fix: Line Comment Refactor (#180)

This MR re-implements and fixes logic that better handles single-line comments. It does this by parsing the hunk headers and examining the actual changes they contain in order to form the Gitlab payload correctly. Addresses #128
This commit is contained in:
Harrison (Harry) Cramer
2024-02-18 21:19:31 -05:00
committed by GitHub
parent baee20b279
commit faf2a25dc4
3 changed files with 224 additions and 94 deletions

243
lua/gitlab/reviewer/diffview.lua Normal file → Executable file
View File

@@ -126,106 +126,117 @@ M.get_location = function(range)
return
end
local bufnr = vim.api.nvim_get_current_buf()
-- If there's a range, use the start of the visual selection, not the current line
local current_line = range and range.start_line or vim.api.nvim_win_get_cursor(0)[1]
-- check if we are in the diffview tab
-- Check if we are in the diffview tab
local tabnr = vim.api.nvim_get_current_tabpage()
if tabnr ~= M.tabnr then
u.notify("Line location can only be determined within reviewer window", vim.log.levels.ERROR)
return
end
-- check if we are in the diffview buffer
-- Check if we are in the diffview buffer
local view = diffview_lib.get_current_view()
if view == nil then
u.notify("Could not find Diffview view", vim.log.levels.ERROR)
return
end
local layout = view.cur_layout
local result = {}
local type
local is_new
if
layout.a.file.bufnr == bufnr
or (M.lines_are_same(view.cur_layout) and layout.b.file.bufnr == bufnr and range == nil)
then
result.file_name = layout.a.file.path
result.old_line = current_line
type = "old"
is_new = false
elseif layout.b.file.bufnr == bufnr then
result.file_name = layout.b.file.path
result.new_line = current_line
type = "new"
is_new = true
else
u.notify("Line location can only be determined within reviewer window")
local layout = view.cur_layout
---@type ReviewerInfo
local reviewer_info = {
file_name = layout.a.file.path,
new_line = nil,
old_line = nil,
range_info = nil,
}
local a_win = u.get_window_id_by_buffer_id(layout.a.file.bufnr)
local b_win = u.get_window_id_by_buffer_id(layout.b.file.bufnr)
local current_win = vim.fn.win_getid()
local is_current_sha = current_win == b_win
if a_win == nil or b_win == nil then
u.notify("Error retrieving window IDs for current files", vim.log.levels.ERROR)
return
end
local hunks = u.parse_hunk_headers(result.file_name, state.INFO.target_branch)
if hunks == nil then
local current_file = M.get_current_file()
if current_file == nil then
u.notify("Error retrieving current file from Diffview", vim.log.levels.ERROR)
return
end
local a_linenr = vim.api.nvim_win_get_cursor(a_win)[1]
local b_linenr = vim.api.nvim_win_get_cursor(b_win)[1]
local data = u.parse_hunk_headers(current_file, state.INFO.target_branch)
if data.hunks == nil then
u.notify("Could not parse hunks", vim.log.levels.ERROR)
return
end
local current_line_info
if is_new then
current_line_info = u.get_lines_from_hunks(hunks, result.new_line, is_new)
else
current_line_info = u.get_lines_from_hunks(hunks, result.old_line, is_new)
-- Will be different depending on focused window.
local modification_type =
M.get_modification_type(a_linenr, b_linenr, is_current_sha, data.hunks, data.all_diff_output)
if modification_type == "bad_file_unmodified" then
u.notify("Comments on unmodified lines will be placed in the old file", vim.log.levels.WARN)
end
-- If single line comment is outside of changed lines then we need to specify both new line and old line
-- otherwise the API returns error.
-- https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/discussions.html#create-a-new-thread-in-the-merge-request-diff
if not current_line_info.in_hunk then
result.old_line = current_line_info.old_line
result.new_line = current_line_info.new_line
end
-- If users leave single-line comments in the new buffer that should be in the old buffer, we can
-- tell because the line will not have changed. Send the correct payload.
if M.lines_are_same(view.cur_layout) and layout.b.file.bufnr == bufnr and range == nil then
local a_win = u.get_win_from_buf(layout.a.file.bufnr)
local a_cursor = vim.api.nvim_win_get_cursor(a_win)[1]
result.old_line = a_cursor
result.new_line = a_cursor
type = "old"
-- Comment on new line: Include only new_line in payload.
if modification_type == "added" then
reviewer_info.old_line = nil
reviewer_info.new_line = b_linenr
-- Comment on deleted line: Include only new_line in payload.
elseif modification_type == "deleted" then
reviewer_info.old_line = a_linenr
reviewer_info.new_line = nil
-- The line was not found in any hunks, only send the old line number
elseif modification_type == "unmodified" or modification_type == "bad_file_unmodified" then
reviewer_info.old_line = a_linenr
reviewer_info.new_line = b_linenr
end
if range == nil then
return result
return reviewer_info
end
result.range_info = { start = {}, ["end"] = {} }
-- If leaving a multi-line comment, we want to also add range_info to the payload.
local is_new = reviewer_info.new_line ~= nil
local current_line_info = is_new and u.get_lines_from_hunks(data.hunks, reviewer_info.new_line, is_new)
or u.get_lines_from_hunks(data.hunks, reviewer_info.old_line, is_new)
local type = is_new and "new" or "old"
---@type ReviewerRangeInfo
local range_info = { start = {}, ["end"] = {} }
if current_line == range.start_line then
result.range_info.start.old_line = current_line_info.old_line
result.range_info.start.new_line = current_line_info.new_line
result.range_info.start.type = type
range_info.start.old_line = current_line_info.old_line
range_info.start.new_line = current_line_info.new_line
range_info.start.type = type
else
local start_line_info = u.get_lines_from_hunks(hunks, range.start_line, is_new)
result.range_info.start.old_line = start_line_info.old_line
result.range_info.start.new_line = start_line_info.new_line
result.range_info.start.type = type
local start_line_info = u.get_lines_from_hunks(data.hunks, range.start_line, is_new)
range_info.start.old_line = start_line_info.old_line
range_info.start.new_line = start_line_info.new_line
range_info.start.type = type
end
if current_line == range.end_line then
result.range_info["end"].old_line = current_line_info.old_line
result.range_info["end"].new_line = current_line_info.new_line
result.range_info["end"].type = type
range_info["end"].old_line = current_line_info.old_line
range_info["end"].new_line = current_line_info.new_line
range_info["end"].type = type
else
local end_line_info = u.get_lines_from_hunks(hunks, range.end_line, is_new)
result.range_info["end"].old_line = end_line_info.old_line
result.range_info["end"].new_line = end_line_info.new_line
result.range_info["end"].type = type
local end_line_info = u.get_lines_from_hunks(data.hunks, range.end_line, is_new)
range_info["end"].old_line = end_line_info.old_line
range_info["end"].new_line = end_line_info.new_line
range_info["end"].type = type
end
return result
reviewer_info.range_info = range_info
return reviewer_info
end
---Return content between start_line and end_line
@@ -236,12 +247,9 @@ M.get_lines = function(start_line, end_line)
return vim.api.nvim_buf_get_lines(0, start_line - 1, end_line, false)
end
---Checks whether the lines in the two buffers are the same
---@return boolean
M.lines_are_same = function(layout)
local a_win = u.get_win_from_buf(layout.a.file.bufnr)
local b_win = u.get_win_from_buf(layout.b.file.bufnr)
local a_cursor = vim.api.nvim_win_get_cursor(a_win)[1]
local b_cursor = vim.api.nvim_win_get_cursor(b_win)[1]
M.lines_are_same = function(layout, a_cursor, b_cursor)
local line_a = u.get_line_content(layout.a.file.bufnr, a_cursor)
local line_b = u.get_line_content(layout.b.file.bufnr, b_cursor)
return line_a == line_b
@@ -324,4 +332,101 @@ M.set_callback_for_reviewer_leave = function(callback)
})
end
---Returns whether the comment is on a deleted line, added line, or unmodified line.
---This is in order to build the payload for Gitlab correctly by setting the old line and new line.
---@param a_linenr number
---@param b_linenr number
---@param is_current_sha boolean
---@param hunks Hunk[] A list of hunks
---@param all_diff_output table The raw diff output
function M.get_modification_type(a_linenr, b_linenr, is_current_sha, hunks, all_diff_output)
for _, hunk in ipairs(hunks) do
local old_line_end = hunk.old_line + hunk.old_range
local new_line_end = hunk.new_line + hunk.new_range
if is_current_sha then
-- If it is a single line change and neither hunk has a range, then it's added
if b_linenr >= hunk.new_line and b_linenr <= new_line_end then
if hunk.new_range == 0 and hunk.old_range == 0 then
return "added"
end
-- If leaving a comment on the new window, we may be commenting on an added line
-- or on an unmodified line. To tell, we have to check whether the line itself is
-- prefixed with "+" and only return "added" if it is.
if M.line_was_added(b_linenr, hunk, all_diff_output) then
return "added"
end
end
else
-- It's a deletion if it's in the range of the hunks and the new
-- range is zero, since that is only a deletion hunk, or if we find
-- a match in another hunk with a range, and the corresponding line is prefixed
-- with a "-" only. If it is, then it's a deletion.
if a_linenr >= hunk.old_line and a_linenr <= old_line_end and hunk.old_range == 0 then
return "deleted"
end
if
(a_linenr >= hunk.old_line and a_linenr <= old_line_end)
or (a_linenr >= hunk.new_line and b_linenr <= new_line_end)
then
if M.line_was_removed(a_linenr, hunk, all_diff_output) then
return "deleted"
end
end
end
end
-- If we can't find the line, this means the user is either trying to leave
-- a comment on an unchanged line in the new or old file SHA. This is only
-- allowed in the old file
return is_current_sha and "bad_file_unmodified" or "unmodified"
end
---@param linnr number
---@param hunk Hunk
---@param all_diff_output table
M.line_was_removed = function(linnr, hunk, all_diff_output)
for matching_line_index, line in ipairs(all_diff_output) do
local found_hunk = u.parse_possible_hunk_headers(line)
if found_hunk ~= nil and vim.deep_equal(found_hunk, hunk) then
-- We found a matching hunk, now we need to iterate over the lines from the raw diff output
-- at that hunk until we reach the line we are looking for. When the indexes match we check
-- to see if that line is deleted or not.
for hunk_line_index = found_hunk.old_line, hunk.old_line + hunk.old_range - 1, 1 do
local line_content = all_diff_output[matching_line_index + 1]
if hunk_line_index == linnr then
if string.match(line_content, "^%-") then
return "deleted"
end
end
end
end
end
end
---@param linnr number
---@param hunk Hunk
---@param all_diff_output table
M.line_was_added = function(linnr, hunk, all_diff_output)
for matching_line_index, line in ipairs(all_diff_output) do
local found_hunk = u.parse_possible_hunk_headers(line)
if found_hunk ~= nil and vim.deep_equal(found_hunk, hunk) then
-- For added lines, we only want to iterate over the part of the diff that has has new lines,
-- so we skip over the old range. We then keep track of the increment to the original new line index,
-- and iterate until we reach the end of the total range of this hunk. If we arrive at the matching
-- index for the line number, we check to see if the line was added.
local i = 0
local old_range = (found_hunk.old_range == 0 and found_hunk.old_line ~= 0) and 1 or found_hunk.old_range
for hunk_line_index = matching_line_index + old_range + 1, matching_line_index + old_range + found_hunk.new_range, 1 do
local line_content = all_diff_output[hunk_line_index]
if (found_hunk.new_line + i) == linnr then
if string.match(line_content, "^%+") then
return "added"
end
end
i = i + 1
end
end
end
end
return M